See also Wiki styles, Cookbook:WikiStylesPlus
As well as the ordinary ordered (numbered) and unordered lists it is possible to use the styles %ROMAN%, %roman%, %ALPHA%, and %alpha%. The style is used in the first element of an ordered list, for example:
# %ROMAN% Top level
## %ALPHA% Second level
## Second level
## Second level
### Third level
### Third level
## Second level
### Third level
#### %alpha% Fourth level
##### %roman% Fifth level
##### Fifth level
#### Fourth level
# Top level
# Top level
| - Top level
- Second level
- Second level
- Second level
- Third level
- Third level
- Second level
- Third level
- Fourth level
- Fifth level
- Fifth level
- Fourth level
- Top level
- Top level
|
If you wish to start a numbered (ordered) list at an arbitrary starting value, use the value style, for example:
# %item value=2517% Top level
## %ROMAN% Second level
## Second level
## Second level
### Third level
### Third level
## Second level
### Third level
#### %alpha% Fourth level
##### %roman% Fifth level
##### Fifth level
#### Fourth level
# Top level
# Top level
| - Top level
- Second level
- Second level
- Second level
- Third level
- Third level
- Second level
- Third level
- Fourth level
- Fifth level
- Fifth level
- Fourth level
- Top level
- Top level
|
Note that the value=x option is set numerically even if you are using, for instance, the %alpha% style. So if you wanted to start a second level numbered list at D you would use this:
## %ALPHA%%item value=4%this is a fourth
## and a fifth (should be numbered E)
| - this is a fourth
- and a fifth (should be numbered E)
|
This is nice if you know what number you want your item to have, but it defeats the purpose of having automatically numbered lists (e.g. what if you arbitrarily insert a new numbered item somewhere, now you'd have to go through all your explicit entries and reset those numbers!) it would be really nice if we could put %item value=resume% to tell the engine to pick up where it left off... shi December 31, 2007, at 03:18 PM
I strongly second this thought. The ONLY reason I ever use the renumbering is to resume when the numbers have been reset by an intervening markup. It's very awkward to have to do manual renumbering on a potentially long list with potentially many interruptions.
Peter Bowers March 31, 2008, at 03:22 AM